What Is Hawthorne Effect? Psychology and Examples

Reading Time: 7 minutes

The Hawthorne effect is a psychological phenomenon where individuals modify their behavior simply because they know they are being observed. 

Initially discovered in the 1920s at the Western Electric Hawthorne Works in Chicago, this effect has since been studied in various fields, including psychology, sociology, business, and user experience (UX) research. 

This article in Design Journal is about how understanding the Hawthorne effect is crucial for designing more accurate research methodologies and mitigating observer bias in experimental settings.

What is Hawthorne effect?

The term “Hawthorne effect” originates from a series of studies conducted by Elton Mayo and his team at the Hawthorne Works factory between 1924 and 1933. 

The research aimed to determine how different working conditions, such as lighting and break schedules, influenced worker productivity. 

However, researchers found that productivity increased not because of the changes but because the workers knew they were being observed.

The Hawthorne effect psychology suggests that people tend to improve their performance, exhibit socially desirable behavior, or act differently when they know they are being monitored. 

This can skew research results and make drawing accurate conclusions about real-world behavior difficult.

Hawthorne effect psychology

The Hawthorne Effect Psychology refers to the phenomenon in which individuals alter their behavior due to the awareness that they are being observed. 

This effect has been widely studied in behavioral psychology, workplace studies, and cognitive science. 

It is closely related to observer bias, where the presence of an observer influences participants’ actions, often leading to artificial or exaggerated behaviors.

The Hawthorne Effect was first identified in the 1920s during industrial experiments at the Hawthorne Works factory in Chicago. Researchers, led by Elton Mayo, sought to analyze how different working conditions affected productivity. 

However, they observed that regardless of the changes—increasing or decreasing lighting, adjusting break times, or modifying work hours—worker performance consistently improved when employees knew they were being watched.

This led psychologists to recognize that observation was a variable influencing behavior, shifting the focus toward human motivation and performance psychology.

Psychological mechanisms behind the Hawthorne effect

In psychology, the Hawthorne Effect is believed to be driven by several cognitive and social factors:

1. Increased Self-Consciousness
   • When individuals realize they are being observed, they become more self-aware. This heightened awareness can lead to behavioral adjustments as they attempt to conform to expected social norms.
2. Social Desirability Bias
   • People tend to modify their actions to appear more favorable to observers in professional settings, such as psychological studies or medical environments.
3. Expectation and Feedback Loops
   • When participants perceive that certain behaviors are desired, they may unconsciously align their actions with those expectations, creating a feedback loop that skews research findings.

How is Hawthorne effect presented in UX research?

The Hawthorne Effect occurs when individuals modify their behavior because they know they are being observed. This can lead to biased results in UX research, as participants may act differently than they usually would in real-world scenarios.

Field studies

Field research or studies involve observing users in their natural environment while interacting with a product or service. However, the Hawthorne Effect can significantly influence the outcomes. 

Users who know they are being observed might alter their natural behaviors to appear more efficient, competent, or cooperative. 

For instance, users who struggle with an interface might attempt to use it more proficiently because they know they are being watched. This can lead to observer bias, where researchers interpret the altered behaviors as user patterns, potentially leading to misleading insights.

To mitigate this, researchers can:

• Extend observation periods to allow participants to acclimate and act naturally.
• Use unobtrusive recording methods such as remote monitoring.
• Conduct multiple sessions to compare behaviors over time.

User testing

User testing is a crucial method in UX research to evaluate a product’s usability. However, participants may unconsciously modify their behavior when they know they are part of a study, aligning their responses with what they think the researcher wants.

For example, a user testing a mobile app might navigate menus more methodically than in real-life scenarios. This skewed behavior might give the impression that the interface is more intuitive than it is.

To reduce the impact of the Hawthorne Effect, UX researchers can:

• Use A/B testing where participants are unaware of which version is being tested.
• Use think-aloud protocols cautiously, ensuring participants do not over-rationalize their actions.
• Encourage honest feedback by reassuring participants that mistakes and struggles are valuable for research.

Surveys

Surveys are a standard UX research tool to collect qualitative and quantitative data. However, self-reported data can be highly susceptible to the Hawthorne Effect. 

Participants may give answers they believe are socially desirable or align with what they assume the researcher expects rather than providing honest feedback.

For example, in a survey about an ecommerce website’s usability, users may rate the experience higher than they truly feel because they want to be seen as competent online shoppers. This observer bias can distort actual user satisfaction levels.

Strategies to mitigate this effect include:

• Making surveys anonymous to encourage honest responses.
• Using indirect questioning techniques to reduce response bias.
• Designing questions that focus on past behavior rather than hypothetical scenarios.

Diary studies

Diary study allow researchers to track user behavior over a more extended period, providing deeper insights into daily interactions with a product. 

However, participants may still alter their responses due to the Hawthorne Effect. They may exaggerate positive experiences or omit frustrations because researchers will analyze their logs.

For example, suppose a diary study examines how users engage with a fitness app. In that case, they might log extra workouts or minimize complaints about bugs to present themselves in a more favorable light.

To counteract this, researchers can:

• Ensure diaries are self-recorded without researcher interference.
• Encourage participants to document both positive and negative experiences.
• Use automated tracking where possible to supplement self-reported data.

Mitigation strategies for the Hawthorne effect

While the Hawthorne Effect cannot be eliminated, researchers can take proactive steps to minimize its impact:

Naturalistic observation

Observing users in real-world settings without awareness can lead to more authentic insights. 

Instead of formal lab studies, researchers can leverage passive observation techniques, such as analyzing user behavior in a store using security footage or tracking app interactions via backend analytics without user intervention.

Longitudinal studies

Conducting repeated sessions over an extended period, much like a longitudinal study, helps participants return to their natural behaviors once the novelty of being observed fades. 

For example, if testing a new feature, engaging users over multiple weeks can provide a clearer picture of sustained interaction patterns rather than just initial reactions.

Passive data collection

Using analytics tools to track user interactions without direct involvement can provide unbiased data. 

Heatmaps, session recordings, and behavioral analytics software offer insights into user behavior without requiring them to modify their actions consciously.

Blinding participants

Not revealing the true purpose of a study or mixing test scenarios can reduce behavioral modifications. 

For example, if assessing a specific feature, a researcher may frame the study as a general usability test rather than highlighting the exact function being evaluated.

Here are some easy steps to conduct usability testing in UX.

Encouraging honest feedback

Creating a judgment-free research environment ensures users feel comfortable sharing genuine experiences. 

Emphasizing that researchers seek problem areas rather than positive reinforcement can help mitigate response bias.

Integrating automated tracking

Supplementing self-reported data with automated logs can counteract discrepancies caused by the Hawthorne Effect. For instance, researchers can compare participant entries with actual usage metrics in a diary study about app usage to identify inconsistencies.

Hawthorne effect examples

To illustrate this observer bias, consider these real-world Hawthrone effect examples:

Productivity tracking apps

Employees using time-tracking software might work longer hours or take fewer breaks when they know their activity is being monitored. This behavioral change can lead to inaccurate productivity data, as employees might focus more on appearing productive than their actual work efficiency. 

Once the observation period ends, their working patterns may revert to normal, revealing a discrepancy between observed and actual behaviors.

Website usability testing 

A user testing a newly designed website might navigate menus more carefully than they typically would, making the interface seem more intuitive than it is in everyday use. 

For example, in a research setting, a user might spend extra time reading menu labels or using search functions more methodically because they want to provide constructive feedback. 

However, in a real-world setting, they might become frustrated quickly and abandon the task, which would not be captured in a controlled environment.

Smart home devices

Participants in smart home studies may consciously use voice assistants more often during observation periods, skewing adoption rate statistics. 

A family that usually relies on manual controls might make an extra effort to use voice commands simply because they know that researchers are tracking their interactions. This can lead to overestimating real-world usage patterns and incorrect assumptions about user behavior.

Customer support feedback

Users who complete a satisfaction survey after interacting with a support agent may rate the experience higher if they know their feedback will be directly linked to the agent. 

However, if participants believe their responses might impact the agent’s performance review, they may inflate ratings rather than provide honest feedback. This observer bias can lead to misleading data that does not truly reflect customer satisfaction levels.

Conclusion

The Hawthorne effect is crucial in research methodology and UX design. It challenges and provides insight into human behavior under observation. 

By acknowledging and mitigating this effect, researchers can design better studies, ensure more reliable data collection, and create user experiences that reflect natural interactions. 

Understanding the Hawthorne effect psychology is essential for improving experimental accuracy and designing more user-centered products.

Subscribe to our Design Journal for exclusive design principles and stay ahead with the latest trends.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Hawthorne experiment theory? 

The Hawthorne experiment theory suggests that individuals modify their behavior when they know they are being observed. This phenomenon was first identified in Western Electric Hawthorne Works studies in the 1920s and 1930s.

What are the 4 stages of the Hawthorne experiment? 

The four stages of the Hawthorne experiment include:

1. Illumination Studies – Examined the impact of lighting conditions on worker productivity.
2. Relay Assembly Test Room Studies – Assessed changes in work conditions, such as breaks and work hours.
3. Interview Program – Gathered employee feedback on workplace conditions and morale.
4. Bank Wiring Observation Room Study – Investigated social dynamics and peer influence on productivity.

Who is the father of the Hawthorne experiment? 

Elton Mayo, an Australian psychologist and organizational theorist, is the father of the Hawthorne experiment. His research contributed significantly to industrial psychology and human relations management.

What did the Hawthorne experiment conclude?

The Hawthorne experiment concluded that social and psychological factors, such as employee attention, group dynamics, and workplace environment, play a crucial role in productivity. It highlighted the importance of human relations in organizational settings.