Reading Time: 8 minutes

Choosing a frontend framework sometimes feels like standing at a crossroads. Both paths look promising, but the destination depends on what you really need. This is exactly the situation developers face when deciding between Next JS and React JS.

React JS is already one of the most popular libraries in the world. Next JS builds on top of React and gives it superpowers. But which one is right for your project? That’s the big question this blog answers.

Many teams planning to hire ReactJS developers or hire NextJS developers often get confused about which approach suits their product better. Understanding the core differences can save time, effort, and unnecessary rewrites later.

In this design journal blog, we break down the differences between Next JS vs React JS, how they work, their strengths, and when to choose one over the other.

What is Next JS?

Next JS is a framework built on top of React. It was created by Vercel to add structure, performance features, and server-side capabilities to React apps.

Next JS includes file-based routing, server-side rendering, static site generation, and API routes. It helps you build full-stack applications with less setup. Instead of wiring many tools, a lot of functionality comes ready to use.

Think of Next JS as React plus a set of production-ready defaults. It keeps React’s component model but adds ways to render pages faster and more SEO-friendly. Next JS is ideal when you want both a great developer experience and a fast user experience.

What is React JS?

React JS is a JavaScript library to build user interface. It was created by Facebook (now Meta) and focuses on components and state management. With React, you build reusable UI pieces that fit together like Lego blocks.

React handles the view layer only, that means it renders the parts of the page users interact with.

It runs mostly in the browser using client-side rendering. Developers often pair React with other libraries for routing, state, and backend calls. React’s strengths are its flexibility and large ecosystem.

There are many tools, libraries, and community guides to help you build apps.
This makes React a great choice when you want control and a custom architecture.

Next JS vs React JS: Key differences

Below are the main differences you should know. I’ll explain each with simple examples and practical notes.

Difference between Next JS and React JS in purpose

React is a UI library focused on building interactive components. It gives you the building blocks and lets you choose the rest.

Next JS is a framework that uses React to build whole applications. It adds routing, server rendering, and tools that help in production.

So, React is about “how to build UI.” Next JS is about “how to ship an app” with React.

Routing

React does not include routing by default. You usually add React Router or similar libraries for navigation.

Next JS provides file-based routing out of the box. Create a file in the pages or app folder, and you have a route.

That simple file-as-route approach speeds development and reduces configuration. It is especially helpful on larger teams and projects where consistency matters.

Rendering

React apps commonly use CSR (Client-Side Rendering). The browser downloads a minimal HTML and JavaScript bundle and renders content dynamically.

Next JS supports multiple rendering modes: SSR (Server-Side Rendering), SSG (Static Site Generation), ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration), and client-side rendering. This gives you the flexibility to choose the best rendering strategy per page.

For example, marketing pages can be static and fast, while dynamic dashboards can use CSR or SSR as needed. That control helps balance speed, SEO, and interactivity.

Performance

React performance depends heavily on how you design and optimize the app. You handle code splitting, lazy loading, image optimization, and caching manually or with libraries.

Next JS adds performance features by default, like automatic code splitting and image optimization. It also supports prerendering which reduces the JavaScript needed on first load.

As a result, Next JS apps often show better initial load metrics without a lot of extra setup. That’s why many companies prefer Next JS for customer-facing sites.

SEO

React’s client-side rendering can be a challenge for SEO out of the box. Search engines do better when content is available in the initial HTML.

Next JS solves this by enabling SSR (Server-Side Rendering) and SSG (Static Site Generation), making content crawlable on first load. This improves search indexing and organic traffic for content-driven sites.

If SEO is important to your product, for example blogs, marketing sites, or e-commerce. Next JS gives a clear advantage. With React alone, you’ll need extra tools and workarounds to get the same result.

Setup & Project structure differences

React gives you freedom over project structure. You can design folders, naming, and routing however you like.

Next JS guides you toward a standard structure: pages/app, components, public, and api. This convention reduces decision fatigue and makes onboarding easier.

If you prefer a lean setup with defaults, Next JS is helpful. If you need deep customization and want to pick every tool, raw React might suit you better.

Full-stack capability

React is front-end only. If you need backend endpoints, you must add or create an API service separately.

Next JS includes API routes, so you can write server-side handlers inside the same project. This makes building simple full-stack apps straightforward.

For many projects, demos, small SaaS tools, or sites. Keeping front and back under one codebase speeds development. Next JS reduces the need for separate backend repositories in these cases.

Developer experience

React offers flexibility, which developers love. But this freedom sometimes means more setup and more decisions.

Next JS focuses on a smooth developer experience with sensible defaults. It provides built-in TypeScript support, hot reloading, and clear patterns.

For teams that want fast iteration and fewer config headaches, Next JS is usually the better choice. But if your team values custom tooling and architecture control, React remains a strong option.

Pros and Cons of Next JS

Let’s check out the pros and cons of Next.js.

Pros

Built-in routing and rendering options.
Good SEO and faster initial loads.
API routes for simple backend needs.
Production-ready defaults and optimizations.

Cons

Slightly steeper learning curve for SSR/SSG/ISR concepts.
Less freedom, since it’s opinionated.
Extra server-side considerations for hosting and costs in some cases.

Pros and Cons of React JS

Let’s check out the pros and cons of ReactJS.

Pros

Flexible and lightweight to get started.
Massive ecosystem and community resources.
Great when you only need the UI layer.
Works with many build tools and libraries.

Cons

No built-in routing or server features.
SEO requires extra setup.
More manual configuration for production features.
Can get inconsistent structure across projects.

React JS vs Next JS: Which one should you choose?

If your project needs SEO, fast first loads, and a single codebase for front and back, choose Next JS. It reduces configuration while giving production-ready tools.

If you only need a highly interactive UI or a front-end that pairs with an existing backend, React is a fine choice. React fits projects where maximum flexibility and a custom stack are priorities.

Also consider team skills, hosting plans, and long-term maintenance. A small team might appreciate Next JS’s defaults, while a team of frontend specialists might prefer React.

Real-world examples: Next JS vs React JS in action

Seeing real companies use these tools helps make the choice clearer. Below are notable examples and why they picked each technology.

Companies using Next JS

Vercel, Next JS’s creator, uses Next JS for many of its marketing and docs sites. Next JS is a natural fit for these content-heavy, SEO-focused pages.

Notion uses Next JS for parts of its web platform to manage content rendering and improve load times. E-commerce brands and publishers use Next JS to improve search visibility and speed.

Twitch and TikTok have used Next JS for certain web properties where server rendering and fast load times are required. These companies often combine Next JS with server infrastructure to handle global traffic.

Companies using React JS

Facebook is the originator of React and uses it for many interactive parts of its product. Instagram, which is also owned by Meta, uses React heavily for UI components.

Airbnb uses React for complex user interfaces and interactions. Their platform requires a lot of real-time UI updates and a flexible frontend architecture.

Other companies like Discord and Netflix use React for component-driven UIs. These products sometimes pair React with other backend solutions and custom routing.

Why these choices make sense?

React is chosen when teams need the freedom to architect complex client-heavy apps. It lets teams pick the best libraries and patterns for their use case.

Next JS is chosen when SEO, speed, and a fast path to production matter most. It reduces the number of decisions and gives a solid default architecture.

Both choices are battle-tested at scale and can support massive traffic when done right. The decision usually comes down to project goals, not “which is better.”

Conclusion

Both Next JS and React JS are excellent tools. They share a close relationship, Next JS is built on React. React gives you control, flexibility, and a wide ecosystem. It is great for app-like interfaces and when you want to decide every part of the stack.

Next JS gives you structure, SEO-friendly rendering, and built-in performance features. It is ideal for production sites, content platforms, and full-stack apps.

When comparing Next JS vs React JS, the right choice really depends on your project’s priorities. If you want faster development, strong SEO, and smoother deployment, Next JS is often the practical option.

However, React remains essential when you need a completely custom frontend or when integrating with complex backend services. Ultimately, choose the tool that best matches your product goals, team skills, and long-term plans.

Frequently asked questions

Is NextJS better than React?

NextJS is better when you need fast loading pages, good SEO, and server-side features. React is better when you only need the UI layer and want full control over how your app is built. So “better” depends on what your project needs, not the tool itself.

Should I learn Next or React first?

It’s easier to learn React first because NextJS is built on top of React. Once you understand React’s basics: components, props, and state. Learning NextJS becomes simple and natural.

Can I use React without NextJS?

Yes, absolutely. React works completely fine on its own for building user interfaces. NextJS is optional and only adds extra features like routing and server-side rendering.

Does Next replace React?

No, NextJS does not replace React. NextJS actually uses React underneath, so you still write React code inside a NextJS project. Think of NextJS as a framework that expands what React can do.

Is NextJS slower than React?

No, NextJS is not slower. In fact, it often loads faster because it supports server-side and static rendering. However, performance always depends on how the app is built and optimized.

Next JS vs React JS: What Truly Sets Them Apart?

Tags:

Rishikesh Sureliya

Inspire the next generation of designers

Read Next