Dark Patterns: Meaning, Psychology, And Examples

Reading Time: 13 minutes

Understanding dark patterns is crucial for creating ethical digital interfaces in the ever-evolving user experience (UX) design landscape. These deceptive patterns not only manipulate users but also challenge the integrity of design.

As consumers increasingly navigate the digital world, the prevalence of dark patterns has become a pressing issue. These tactics can lead to frustration and a lack of trust, highlighting the importance of ethical design practices.

Research by xigen indicates that nearly 90% of users have encountered dark patterns, making this topic critical for designers who strive to create user-friendly experiences. This alarming statistic underscores the need for awareness and education in the field.

This Design Journal article explores the various types of dark patterns, their meaning, and notable examples that illustrate their impact on user behavior.

We will also discuss the implications for UX design and how to identify and avoid these manipulative strategies.

By delving into this topic, you will gain insight into the importance of ethical design and learn how to create more transparent and user-friendly interfaces that prioritize user respect over manipulation.

Dark patterns meaning

Understanding “dark patterns” is crucial in user experience (UX) design. These are design techniques deliberately crafted to manipulate users into making decisions that may not be in their best interest.

Dark patterns are deceptive user interface designs that trick users into actions they didn’t intend to take. They can manifest in various forms, such as hidden costs or misleading buttons.

UX designers must be vigilant against implementing these patterns, as they can erode trust between users and brands. Dark patterns not only harm the user experience but can also lead to long-term brand damage.

Examples of dark patterns include difficult-to-cancel subscription models or interfaces that prioritize upselling. These tactics exploit cognitive biases, making it essential for us to design ethically.

Ultimately, dark patterns in UX highlight the fine line between persuasion and manipulation. As designers, we aim to enhance user experience, not deceive.

The psychology behind deceptive patterns

The psychology behind dark patterns is rooted in behavioral economics. Users often make decisions based on emotions rather than rational thought, leading to impulsive actions that benefit businesses.

For instance, scarcity cues like countdown timers can pressure users to make quick decisions. This technique exploits the fear of missing out (FOMO), nudging users toward actions they might later regret.

Additionally, dark patterns often take advantage of users’ cognitive overload, where excessive choices can lead them to opt for the easiest path, even if it’s not in their best interest. Understanding this psychology is vital for ethical design.

We should reflect on how these patterns can influence user behavior as we design. Acknowledging their psychological impact can create more transparent and user-friendly experiences.

Types of dark patterns in user interfaces

In the race to meet KPIs and improve conversion rates, it’s easy to overlook the long-term cost of certain UI/UX decisions.

Dark patterns—also known as deceptive—are intentionally misleading design strategies that trick users into taking actions they might not otherwise take.

While they seem like clever growth hacks, these patterns often lead to broken trust, negative user sentiment, and even regulatory scrutiny.

Let’s explore the most common types of dark patterns in user interfaces so we can learn to identify, avoid, and actively challenge them in our own practice.

Forced continuity

This dark pattern occurs when users sign up for a free trial only to be charged automatically once the trial ends—without any proactive reminder, visible cancellation option, or consent confirmation.

The experience is designed to catch users off guard, capitalizing on forgetfulness rather than true user intent.

Imagine subscribing to a streaming platform with a 7-day free trial. On day 8, you notice a charge on your card without any prior heads-up or simple way to cancel. That’s forced continuity in action.

It’s not the product users object to—the deceptive way it’s sold. Ethical UX teams counter this by sending reminders before trials expire and making cancellations simple and transparent.

Roach motel

The name says it all: Users can get in easily, but getting out is a nightmare. This dark pattern makes it simple to sign up for a service but unnecessarily difficult to leave—whether that means unsubscribing, deactivating an account, or deleting personal data.

Typically, unsubscribe links are buried in fine print, account deletion flows are hidden under layers of menu items, or users are asked to email support instead of just clicking a button.

These deceptive patterns undermine trust, making users feel trapped and powerless. Great UX design removes friction—not just in acquisition but also in exit.

Confirmshaming

This manipulative dark pattern uses emotionally charged language to guilt users into compliance.

Think of opt-out buttons that say, “No thanks, I don’t care about saving money,” or “I’m okay with missing out.” The goal? This is to shame users into clicking the more favorable (for the business) option.

This kind of language is subtle but psychologically coercive. It compromises the user’s agency and deteriorates the brand’s credibility.

When users are made to feel bad for choosing what’s right for them, the product stops being user-centric. A better approach? Let users opt out with dignity.

Sneak into basket

A classic example of deceptive patterns in e-commerce. This occurs when extra products, services, or fees are added to a user’s cart without explicit consent—often through pre-checked boxes or hidden line items.

From donation add-ons to extended warranties, this tactic assumes rather than asks. It plays on inattentiveness and exploits speed-based checkout behaviors.

Ethical design ensures every selection is intentional and communicated. Consent should be active, not passive.

Hidden costs

This dark pattern reveals hidden fees only at the final stage of the checkout process—after the user has committed time and effort filling in details.

These might include taxes, service fees, shipping charges, or platform costs that weren’t disclosed earlier.

The result is often cart abandonment and a sense of betrayal. When the cost narrative shifts at the last minute, users feel deceived. Transparent pricing builds trust. Displaying total costs early on—even if higher—encourages informed, confident decisions.

Trick questions

This type of dark pattern uses complex, misleading, or double-negative phrasing to confuse users—especially in consent agreements.

The intention is to get users to agree to something they likely would have declined, such as marketing emails or third-party data sharing.

For instance, a checkbox that says, “Uncheck this box if you don’t want to receive emails,” creates unnecessary friction and cognitive load.

These patterns rely on misdirection, not clarity. Good UX speaks the user’s language—simply, clearly, and honestly.

Misdirection

Misdirection diverts the user’s attention from what they actually want to do toward a more profitable or desired business action.

This might be done through the visual hierarchy—like making a “Buy Now” button more prominent than a “Continue as Guest” option—or through subtle interface manipulations.

While design should guide, it should never deceive. There’s a fine line between persuasion and manipulation. Transparent UX allows users to make the best choice for themselves, not just for the business.

Disguised ads

This deceptive pattern disguises advertisements as legitimate content or interface elements.

Users click on them thinking they’re reading an article, navigating to the next page, or accessing a helpful feature—only to be redirected or monetized without consent.

It disrupts user flow, erodes credibility, and blurs the line between utility and marketing. Honest labeling of ads and sponsored content isn’t just a good practice—it’s a legal and ethical imperative in today’s digital landscape.

Why it matters?

Understanding the types of dark patterns is more than a technical checklist—it’s a mindset shift. As designers, researchers, and product builders, we are responsible for crafting experiences that are efficient, respectful, and transparent.

At Octet Design Studio, designers advocate for transparent, inclusive, and human-centered design. Every crafted interaction has a chance to respect the user’s time, intelligence, and intent.

Visual dark patterns examples in action

Understanding dark patterns intellectually is one thing. Seeing them in real-world interfaces is another.

As designers, developers, and product thinkers, we’re often tasked with shaping digital experiences that balance business goals with user needs.

But too often, the scales tip intentionally through designs that exploit user behavior.

In this section, we examine visual examples of dark patterns, analyze how they deceive users, and explore the design decisions behind them.

These are not isolated incidents—they’re systemic issues in modern UX that deserve our scrutiny.

Amazon’s Prime cancellation maze: A classic roach motel

Amazon’s Prime cancellation process has become a poster child for the Roach Motel dark pattern—where users can sign up easily but face a convoluted path to cancel.

The interface requires users to go through multiple screens with carefully worded questions, misleading buttons, and “reminder” messages about lost benefits.

One screen even features a large “Keep My Membership” button and a smaller “End My Benefits,” subtly nudging users toward staying.

This deceptive pattern exploits inertia and user fatigue. Amazon’s design maximizes retention but at the cost of transparency and user autonomy.

TurboTax’s “Free Filing” misdirection

TurboTax’s “Free File” campaign is a prime example of a dark pattern designed to mislead. While they advertise free tax filing, most users are funneled into paid plans through subtle interface decisions.

The free version is hidden behind obscure links and not indexed by search engines, and users are gradually upsold after investing time in the process.

This dark pattern example combines misdirection with hidden costs, manipulating the flow to prioritize conversions over ethical user guidance.

LinkedIn’s confirmshaming in invitations

When users tried to skip importing contacts to invite on LinkedIn, the interface responded with guilt-laden prompts like, “Are you sure you want to miss out on expanding your network?” 

The primary button would say, “Yes, Invite All,” while the opt-out was a barely noticeable text link.

This confirms a dark pattern that uses emotionally manipulative language and visual hierarchy to shame users into complying.

It’s a deceptive pattern that thrives on psychological pressure, disguised as helpful onboarding.

Ryanair’s sneaky travel insurance field

In Ryanair’s booking process, the dark pattern of sneaking items into the basket is well-disguised.

When prompted to select travel insurance, users are presented with a dropdown list of countries, with “No Insurance Required” listed as one of the countries.

This isn’t an oversight—it’s a design strategy to obscure the opt-out path.

This deceptive pattern preys on cognitive overload and quick decision-making. Many users, hurrying to book a flight, will inadvertently purchase insurance they never intended to.

HelloFresh’s difficult cancellation process

HelloFresh has been criticized for its forced continuity model, where users unknowingly continue a subscription and face a frustratingly complex cancellation process.

Before they can finally opt out, users must click through multiple screens, answer repeated questions, and justify their cancellation.

This dark pattern example blends roach motel and obstruction, intentionally designed to wear down the user into giving up. While clean and modern, the interface disguises manipulation behind every “Next” button.

Disguised ads masquerading as editorial content

On platforms like Forbes and content recommendation engines like Taboola, users are exposed to disguised ads that mimic the look and feel of actual articles.

From headline style to thumbnail design, these sponsored posts are intentionally crafted to deceive users into thinking they’re part of the editorial feed.

These deceptive patterns undermine journalistic integrity and exploit trust. The goal is to increase ad engagement by blurring the lines between content and advertisement, without the user’s informed consent.

Trick questions in cookie consent forms

Despite GDPR, many websites still use trick questions and double negatives in cookie banners. For instance, checkboxes labeled “Uncheck if you don’t want to disallow tracking” create deliberate confusion.

The visual design often reinforces this ambiguity, emphasizing “Agree” buttons and burying “Reject” options in grey text.

This dark pattern manipulates users into consenting without clarity, violating the spirit of privacy laws while technically appearing compliant.

The impact of dark patterns on user trust

As UI/UX designers, we constantly navigate the fine line between user experience and ethical design.

Dark patterns, deceptive design techniques that manipulate users into making choices they might not otherwise make, can significantly undermine user trust.

When users encounter dark patterns, their initial reaction is often confusion or frustration. This emotional response can lead to negative perceptions of the brand.

For instance, if a user feels tricked into signing up for a subscription they didn’t intend to join, they may associate that feeling of manipulation with the entire brand experience.

Research by CBTW shows that 86% of consumers are unlikely to trust a brand that employs manipulative design tactics. Trust is a cornerstone of user loyalty; dark patterns erode this essential foundation.

Moreover, deceptive patterns can lead to a sense of helplessness among users, making them feel they lack control over their choices. This can damage their overall perception of the website or application.

Long-term consequences for brands and designers

The long-term consequences of employing dark patterns extend beyond immediate user dissatisfaction. Brands may face backlash on social media, leading to a tarnished reputation.

A survey indicated that 70% of users are likely to share negative experiences involving dark patterns, amplifying the damage through word-of-mouth.

Additionally, companies that rely on deceptive design may experience a decline in user retention. Users who feel manipulated are less likely to return, impacting long-term profitability.

As designers, we must recognize that the short-term gains from dark patterns can lead to significant long-term losses in brand loyalty and user trust.

Identifying dark patterns in your designs

As UI/UX designers, we must be vigilant about the ethical implications of our design choices. Dark patterns are deceptive design techniques that manipulate users into actions they may not want.

The first step in identifying dark patterns is to familiarize yourself with the common types, such as hidden costs and forced continuity. Understanding these can help you spot them in your designs.

Next, analyze user flows critically. Walk through your designs as the end-user and observe where you might feel misled or pressured. This perspective is crucial for recognizing potential dark patterns.

Pay attention to language and visual cues. Words can create urgency or imply scarcity, which may lead users to make hasty decisions. Continually evaluate if the language used is straightforward and honest.

Involve user testing early in your design process. Real user feedback can highlight areas where users feel confused or tricked, helping you spot dark patterns before they affect your audience.

Review competitor designs for examples of dark patterns. Learning from others can sharpen your skills in identifying and avoiding these manipulative techniques in your work.

Tools and resources for detecting dark patterns

Utilize design tools like the Dark Patterns Detector to help identify manipulative design elements by analyzing your site’s user experience. This tool can be a game-changer in your evaluation process.

Engage with design communities and forums, such as Designer Hangout or UX Stack Exchange, to discuss dark patterns with peers. Sharing experiences can enhance your ability to recognize these patterns.

Read books and articles focused on ethical design practices. Resources like “Designing for Emotion” by Aarron Walter can provide insights into creating user-friendly experiences without resorting to dark patterns.

Lastly, stay updated on legal implications surrounding dark patterns. Understanding regulations can inform your design strategies and help you create ethical, user-centered experiences.

Ethical considerations and best practices

As UI/UX designers, we are responsible for creating engaging experiences while ensuring ethical integrity.

Dark patterns present a significant challenge, as they manipulate user behavior in ways that can undermine trust and user autonomy.

The moral implications of using dark patterns

Using dark patterns raises serious ethical questions about our roles as designers. When we intentionally mislead users, we compromise their ability to make informed decisions.

These tactics can lead to user frustration and betrayal, damaging the brand reputation. We must consider the long-term implications of our design choices on user relationships.

Moreover, dark patterns disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, including children and the elderly, who may not have the same level of digital literacy. This raises concerns about fairness and equality in our designs.

Ultimately, using dark patterns can create a cycle of mistrust between users and brands, resulting in decreased user engagement over time. We should strive for transparency and honesty in our design practices.

Strategies for designing ethically

To foster ethical design, we must prioritize user-centric principles that enhance trust. We should start by conducting thorough user research to understand users’ needs and preferences.

Implement clear and accessible consent mechanisms that empower users to make informed choices. This promotes a sense of control and respect for their autonomy.

Utilize persuasive design techniques that guide users positively without resorting to manipulation. Focus on creating value-driven experiences that align with user goals.

Audit your designs regularly for potential dark patterns and seek feedback from diverse user groups. This practice helps identify areas where transparency may be lacking.

Lastly, advocate for ethical design within your organization and encourage discussions about the long-term benefits of maintaining user trust. Together, we can foster a culture of integrity in our design practices.

Conclusion

In exploring the intricacies of dark patterns, we uncovered how these deceptive design strategies manipulate user behavior and compromise user experience.

As UI/UX designers, it is crucial to remain vigilant against such practices, as they undermine user trust and challenge our profession’s ethical standards.

Reflecting on the broader implications, we must ask ourselves how we can create intuitive designs that prioritize user autonomy while avoiding manipulative tactics.

Additionally, consider subscribing to our blog for more insights into ethical design practices and to stay updated on the latest trends in user experience.

Frequently asked questions

Are dark patterns illegal?

Dark patterns occupy a grey area in legality. While not all deceptive patterns break laws, many violate the spirit of ethical design.

Regulations like the GDPR in the EU and actions by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are beginning to clamp down on misleading UX, especially those around privacy, consent, and subscriptions.

What is the psychology behind dark patterns?

Dark patterns tap into the predictable vulnerabilities of human decision-making.
They exploit cognitive biases and psychological shortcuts to steer users toward choices they may not have made freely. Here’s what’s often at play:

• Loss aversion: Users are more motivated by the fear of missing out than by the value of what they gain.
• Decision fatigue: Users tend to comply without thinking when interfaces demand repeated micro-decisions.
• Anchoring bias: Presenting a high price first makes a slightly lower one seem like a deal.
• Misdirection: Visual hierarchy and UI flow push users toward preferred business outcomes, not user needs.

Understanding these principles helps us recognize how design can either empower or manipulate. As creators, we hold the tools. The real question is: How do we choose to use them?

Does Google use dark patterns?

Google has faced multiple investigations and lawsuits over deceptive practices, especially regarding data privacy and location tracking.

So, does Google use dark patterns? Arguably, yes—especially when user clarity clashes with business incentives. The broader takeaway is this: dark patterns are not just poor UX—they’re systemic choices made under the guise of “growth.”

What is the danger of dark patterns?

Employing dark patterns can have severe consequences. Users may feel deceived, leading to negative reviews and a loss of trust in the brand.

Additionally, regulators and advocacy groups are increasingly scrutinizing dark patterns, which can result in legal repercussions for companies that rely on such tactics.

What are dark patterns in AI?

AI doesn’t just accelerate decision-making—it also amplifies biases and blind spots. Here’s how dark patterns evolve in AI-driven interfaces:

• AI chatbot tools that bury real help under endless loops, subtly nudging users away from escalation.
• Algorithmic nudging that selectively promotes content based on business goals, not user relevance.
• Synthetic personalization involves interfaces pretending to be “smart” but actually serving narrow funnels toward subscriptions or upsells.
• Opaque consent patterns that misuse machine learning to “predict” preferences, without meaningful transparency.

In AI, patterns become harder to detect—not because they’re subtler but because they’re embedded in the logic of personalization itself.

Ethical design in this space starts with questioning how things look, how decisions are made, and who they serve.